PER CURIAM.
The respondent in this attorney disciplinary matter is charged with failing to disclose to an appellate tribunal controlling authority known to him, not disclosed by opposing counsel, that was directly adverse to his client's position. He also failed to advise his client of the adverse authority when his client was contemplating his legal options.
This matter is presented to this Court upon the Disciplinary Commission's and the respondent's
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.