UNION PACIFIC CORP. v. WENGERT

No. A084875.

95 Cal.Rptr.2d 68 (2000)

79 Cal.App.4th 1444

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION et al., Cross-complainants and Respondents, v. Richard WENGERT, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 22, 2000.

Review Denied August 9, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew M. Klimenko and Michael K. Tcheng, Misciagna & Colombatto, San Francisco, for Appellant.

Anthony C. Diepenbrock, John P. Cotter and Nora E. Dwyer, Diepenbrock & Costa, Sacramento, for Respondents Union Pacific Corporation et al.

Daniel M. Crawford and Donald T. Ramsey, Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Counsel for Respondents LMC Transport Company, Inc. and Bhupinder Singh.


PARRILLI, J.

Since the passage of Proposition 51 in 1986, tort liability for noneconomic damages has been several; the former rule of joint liability was preserved only for economic damages. (Civ.Code, § 1431.2.) In this case, we consider the impact of this change on settling tortfeasors' right to seek comparative equitable indemnity from a nonsettling concurrent tortfeasor. We conclude that comparative equitable indemnity

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases