1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 206 F.3d
  5. 206 F.3d 1422 (2000)
 

IMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HAAS AUTOMATION, INC.

Nos. 99-1019, 99-1067.

206 F.3d 1422 (2000)

IMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAAS AUTOMATION, INC. and Gene Francis Haas, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied May 2, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Greenspoon, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Raymond P. Niro, Robert A. Vitale, Jr., and John C. Janka. Of counsel was Arthur A. Gasey.

Theodore A. Pianko, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, California, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief was Syed A. Hasan.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 2, 2000.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

IMS Technology, Inc. ("IMS") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,477,754 ("the '754 patent") against IMS and in favor of Haas Automation, Inc. and Gene Francis Haas (collectively "Haas"). See IMS Tech., Inc. v. Haas Automation, Inc.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases