CITIBANK, N.A. v. RUSSO


759 A.2d 865 (2000)

334 N.J. Super. 346

CITIBANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel R. RUSSO, Defendant-Appellant and Rose Russo, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alex M. LaTorraca, Bloomfield, argued the cause for appellant (LaTorraca & Christian, attorneys; Mr. LaTorraca, on the brief).

Steven P. McCabe, East Hanover, argued the cause for respondent (Pressler and Pressler, attorneys; Mr. McCabe, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN and LESEMANN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

In 1990 plaintiff Citibank, N.A. filed this action against defendants Rose and Daniel Russo for recovery of the balance of an unpaid credit card debt. Initially, plaintiff attempted to make service of the complaint and summons through the Essex County Sheriff. However, the Sheriff returned the summons unserved, with the notation:

No response to personal attempts. Messages left and letter. They are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases