1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 746 A.2d
  5. 746 A.2d 871 (2000)
 

PUMA v. SULLIVAN

No. 97-CV-1479.

746 A.2d 871 (2000)

Paul and Sheryl PUMA, Appellants, v. Ann SULLIVAN, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric M. Rome, Washington, DC, filed a brief for appellants.

Susan L. Schor, Washington, DC, filed a brief for appellee.

Before FARRELL and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and MACK, Senior Judge.

MACK, Senior Judge:

On March 31, 1997, appellants Paul and Sheryl Puma brought a claim against appellee Ann Sullivan to recover Ms. Sullivan's share of a $15,000 promissory note consummated with the Pumas by her then-husband Eric Ewoldt. Appellants contest the motions court's granting of appellee's motion for summary judgment. Appellants argue that the three-year statute of limitations does not preclude recovery of the loan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases