1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 216 F.3d
  5. 216 F.3d 1372 (2000)
 

SOLOMON v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.

No. 00-1033.

216 F.3d 1372 (2000)

Sandra SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 30, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey L. Weiss, Harry M. Weiss & Associates, P.C., of Scottsdale, AZ, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was Harry M. Weiss.

William H. Baumgartner, Jr., Sidley & Austin, of Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were V. Bryan Medlock, Jr., Sidley & Austin, of Dallas, TX; and Joseph S. Miller, Sidley & Austin, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were Carter G. Phillips; and Harry M. Beggs, Carson Messinger, of Phoenix, AZ.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Sandra Solomon appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona granting Kimberly-Clark Corporation's motion for summary judgment that the claims of U.S. Patent 4,560,381 are invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. See Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., No. CIV 96-2000 PHX RCB (D.Ariz. Sept. 2, 1999) ("Solomon II "). Because the district court erred in holding the claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases