1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 228 F.3d
  5. 228 F.3d 1357 (2000)
 

BANKS v. UNISYS CORP.

No. 00-1030.

228 F.3d 1357 (2000)

Gerald BANKS and Kelly Banks, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNISYS CORPORATION and Burroughs Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent A. Wellman, Blaske & Blaske, P.L.C., of Ann Arbor, Michigan, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. On the brief was Thomas H. Blaske, Blaske & Blaske, P.L.C. Of counsel was Carol A. Elliott, Seeligson, Jordan, DeLoof & Hopper, of Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Jeffrey A. Sadowski, Howard & Howard, of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, argued for defendants-appellees.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

MAYER, Chief Judge.

Gerald Banks appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, holding on summary judgment that there was an implied-in-fact contract to assign inventive rights from Banks to Unisys Corporation and Burroughs Corporation (together, "Unisys"). See Banks v. Unisys Corp., No. 96-CV-70869 (E.D. Mich. June 3, 1999). Because the district court erred by concluding that Banks failed to raise a genuine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases