1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 742 N.E.2d
  5. 742 N.E.2d 829 (2000)
 

SACRAMENTO CRUSHING CORP. v. CORRECT/ALL SEWER, INC.

Nos. 1-99-0882, 1-00-2313.

742 N.E.2d 829 (2000)

318 Ill.App.3d 571

252 Ill.Dec. 291

SACRAMENTO CRUSHING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CORRECT/ALL SEWER, INC.; E.A. Cox Company; The City of Chicago, Department of Transportation, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Defendants (Correct/All Sewer, Inc., Cross-Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Appellant, v. E.A. Cox Company, Cross-Defendant and Counterplaintiff, Appellee.)

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division.

Rehearing Denied February 5, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lamont Cranston Strong, Chicago, for Appellant.

McCracken, Walsh, deLavan & Hetler, Thomas G. Moffitt, Chicago, for Appellee.

Justice COHEN delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant-Appellee E.A. Cox Company (Cox) served as general contractor on a road construction project (the project) for the City of Chicago Department of Transportation (the City). Defendant-appellant Correct/All Sewer, Inc. (Correct/All) was Cox's sewer subcontractor for the project. Defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity) provided Cox's surety bond. Nine subcontractors and/or material suppliers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases