U.S. v. MICROSOFT CORP.

Nos. CIV. A. 98-1232(TPJ), CIV. A. 98-1233(TPJ).

97 F.Supp.2d 59 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. State of New York, Plaintiffs, v. Microsoft Corporation, Defendant. Microsoft Corporation, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, in his official capacity, Counterclaim-Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 7, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis C. Vacco, Atty. Gen. of State of New York, New York City, Christopher Crook, U.S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, CA, A. Douglas Melamed, U.S. Dept. of Justic, Washington, DC, for U.S.

Darryl Andrew Libow, Sullivan & Cromwell, Washington, DC, John Lehman Warden, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for Microsoft Corp.

David Paul Murray, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Washington, DC, for Bloomberg News, movant.

Donald Manwell Falk, Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York City, for Network Computer, Inc., non-party.

Joseph Jay Simons, Clifford, Chance, Rogers & Wells, LLP, Washington, DC, for Sun Microsystems, Inc., non-party.

Samuel R. Miller, Folger, levin & Kahn, L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, Trisa Jean Thompson, Dell Computer Corp., Round Rock, TX, for Dell Computer Corp., non-party.

Junius Carlisle McElveen, Jr., Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Washington, DC, for International Business Machines Corp., non-party.

John P. Mullen, Anderson & Karrenberg, Salt Lake City, UT, for Novell, Inc., non-party.

Gary M. Cohen, Blumenfeld & Cohen, Washington, DC, for Software and Informantion Industry Ass'n, amicus.

Robert H. Bork, Wahsington, DC, pro se, amicus.

Lawrence Lessig, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Cambridge, MA, pro se, amicus.

Gene C. Schaerr, Sidley & austin, Washington, DC, William Joseph Kolasky, Jr., Jayant V. Prabhu, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, DC, for Competitive Technology, movant.

Allen Roger Snyder, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Netscape Communications Corp., movant.

Lee J. Levin, Levine Sullivan & Koch, LLP, Washington, DC, Niki Kuckes, Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Seattle Times, movant.

Lee J. Levin, Levine Sullivan & Koch, LLP, Washington, DC, for ZDTV, LLC, ZDNet, Washington Post Co., Dow Jones & Co., Inc., New York Times Co., American lawyer Media, inc., USA Today, movants.

Lee J. Levin, Jay Ward Brown, Levine Sullivan & Koch, LLP, Washington, DC, for Associated Press, movant.

Robert A. Gutkin, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for San Jose Mercury News, Inc., movant.

Jerry L. Robinett, New Orleans, LA, pro se, movant.

Richard Joseph Favretto, Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York City, for Oracle Corp., movant.

William Dean Coston, Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Compaq Computer Corp., movant.

Benjamin S. Sharp, Perkins, Coie, LLP, Washington, DC, for Boeing Co., movant.

Carl Richard Schenker, Jr., O'Melveny & Myers, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Bristol Technology Inc., movant.

Robert Stephen Barry, Berry & Leftwich, Washington, DC, for Gravity, Inc., movant.

Joseph Kattan, Jeffrey Thomas Filleran, Gibson, Dunn & Vritcher, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Intel Corp., movant.

John G. Froemming, Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White, Washington, DC, for Gateway, Inc., movant.

Samuel R. Miller, Folger, Levon & Kahn, L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, for Hewlett-Packard Co., movant.

Roy A. Day, Tarpon Springs, FL, pro se, movant.

W. David Slawson, Los Angeles, CA, pro se, amicus.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Los Angeles, CA, pro se, movant.

Michael John Quinn, Berry & Leftwich, Washington, DC, for California plaintiffs, movant.

Robert E. Litan, Washington, DC, pro se, movant.

J. Black, Washington, DC, for Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n., movant.

Kenneth A. Wasch, Washington, DC, for Software and Information Industry Ass'n, movant.

Carl Lundgren, Valmarpo Antitrust, Upper Marlboro, MD, for Valmarpo Antitrust, movant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JACKSON, District Judge.

These cases are before the Court for disposition of the sole matter presently remaining for decision by the trial court, namely, entry of appropriate relief for the violations of the Sherman Act, §§ 1 and 2, and various state laws committed by the defendant Microsoft Corporation as found by Court in accordance with its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Final judgment will be entered contemporaneously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases