IN RE QUANITRA M.

(AC 19790)

60 Conn. App. 96 (2000)

IN RE QUANITRA M. ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released September 26, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold V. Amore II, for the appellant (respondent mother).

Mary K. Lenehan, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Stephen P. Hanchuruck, for the minor children.

Lavery, C. J., and Mihalakos and Pellegrino, JS.


Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to three of her four minor children.1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), need not, in the dispositional phase of a termination proceeding,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases