1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 204 F.3d
  5. 204 F.3d 1360 (2000)
 

ULTRA-TEX SURFACES, INC. v. HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO.

Nos. 99-1018, 99-1024.

204 F.3d 1360 (2000)

ULTRA-TEX SURFACES, INC. and Dryvit Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO. and Omega Products Corp., Defendants-Cross Appellants, and Vincent Chacon, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 29, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Schwartz, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

James E. Hawes, Levin & Hawes, of Laguna Beach, California, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Michael G. Dawe and Nancy R. Tragarz, Prenovost, Normandin, Bergh & Dawe, of Santa Ana, California.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Ultra-Tex Surfaces, Inc. and Dryvit Systems, Inc. (collectively "Ultra-Tex") appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California holding that Hill Brothers Chemical Co. and Omega Products Corp. did not infringe claim 6 of U.S. Patent 5,502,941 under the doctrine of equivalents. See Ultra-Tex Surfaces, Inc. v. Hill Bros. Chem. Co., Nos. SA CV 96-1230, -1232 GLT (EEx) (C.D.Cal. Aug. 21, 1998...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases