1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 997 P.2d
  5. 997 P.2d 544 (2000)
 

STATE v. WOODRUFF

No. 1 CA-CR 98-0865.

997 P.2d 544 (2000)

196 Ariz. 359

STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. John C. WOODRUFF, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

March 14, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Ruechel, Navajo County Attorney, David A. Brown, Deputy County Attorney, Holbrook, Attorneys for Appellant.

Keith A. Hammond, P.C. by Keith A. Hammond, Flagstaff, Attorney for Appellee.

O P I N I O N

WEISBERG, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The State appeals from the trial court's order placing John Woodruff ("defendant") on intensive probation. The State claims that the sentence was illegal under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated ("A.R.S.") section 13-914 (Supp.1998) and Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 89-15 ("Order 89-15") relating to administrative requirements for intensive probation. For the following reasons, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases