1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 221 F.3d
  5. 221 F.3d 1310 (2000)
 

ISHIDA CO., LTD. v. TAYLOR

No. 99-1537.

221 F.3d 1310 (2000)

ISHIDA CO., LTD. and Heat & Control, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alfred A. TAYLOR and TNA Australia PTY Ltd., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 20, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jai Ho Rho, Hogan & Hartson, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Stuart Lubitz; and David Lubitz, Hogan & Hartson, of Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Dennis M. McWilliams, Lee, Mann, Smith, McWilliams, Sweeney & Ohlson, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were William M. Lee, Jr. and William J. Lenz.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Alfred A. Taylor and TNA Australia Pty Ltd. (collectively, Taylor) claimed that Ishida's Apex Bagmaker infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,663,917 (the '917 patent). After construing the claims of the patent, the district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement. See Ishida Co. v. Alfred A. Taylor, No. C-98-20418-JF (N.D.Cal. Nov. 23, 1998 and Jan. 25, 1999) (Ishida I and Ishida II); Ishida Co. v. Alfred A. Taylor,<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases