ARMINDO v. PADLOCKER, INC.

No. 99-4144 Non-Argument Calendar.

209 F.3d 1319 (2000)

Carine ARMINDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PADLOCKER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 20, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherryll Martens Dunaj, Martens, Dunaj & Marlowe, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before COX and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Carine Armindo appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendant Padlocker, Inc., on Armindo's claim of pregnancy discrimination. The district court held that Armindo failed to establish that Padlocker's asserted reason for her termination—her poor attendance record—was a pretext for unlawful pregnancy discrimination. We affirm, holding, among other things, that the Pregnancy Discrimination Act ("PDA"), 42 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases