1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 202 F.3d
  5. 202 F.3d 1325 (2000)
 

CRNKOVICH v. U.S.

No. 99-5069.

202 F.3d 1325 (2000)

Lawrence P. CRNKOVICH, Naola A. Crnkovich, William N. Lattin, Susan Lattin, Gilbert Bacon, Arlene J. Bacon, Walter B. Carmichael, Martha Carmichael, Edmond Malouf, and Katherine Malouf, Plaintiffs, and William P. Skinner and Mary W. Skinner, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana R. Taylor, Hagen, Dye, Hirschy & DiLorenzo, P.C., of Portland, Oregon, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.

Thomas J. Sawyer, Attorney, Tax Division, Appellate Section Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, and Richard Farber, Attorney.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The United States Court of Federal Claims granted judgment to William P. Skinner and Mary W. Skinner on their tax refund claims. See Skinner v. United States, No. 95-599-T (CFC Feb. 10, 1999) (judgment). In its thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the trial court held that the Internal Revenue Service did not assess the Skinners within the applicable statutory time period. Crnkovich v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 168, 180 (1998). Final judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases