BURKE v. FINE

No. C8-99-1197.

608 N.W.2d 909 (2000)

Nicholas BURKE, Respondent, v. David G. FINE, d/b/a David G. Fine & Associates, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kristen M. Ludgate, James M. Samples, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Andrew Tanick, Gerald T. Laurie, Lapp, Laurie, Libra, Thomson & Stoebner, Minneapolis, MN for appellant.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge, SCHUMACHER, Judge, and G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from a summary judgment, appellant Dr. David G. Fine argues that the district court erred by holding that the noncompete covenant in his employment agreement with respondent Dr. Nicholas Burke was not enforceable after the underlying employment agreement expired. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant and respondent are cardiologists. Appellant is the sole proprietor of a cardiology practice. In 1995, he hired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases