ROCKFORD TP. v. CITY OF ROCKFORD

No. C0-99-1775.

608 N.W.2d 903 (2000)

ROCKFORD TOWNSHIP, Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCKFORD, Respondent, Minnesota Diversified Products, Inc., intervenor, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 11, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Melloy, Christopher W. Harmoning, Hall & Byers, P.A., St. Cloud (for appellant).

Paula A. Callies, George C. Hoff, Hoff, Barry & Kuderer, P.A., Eden Prairie (for respondent City of Rockford).

David F. Herr, Howard A. Roston, Maslon, Edelman, Borman & Brand, LLP, Minneapolis, (for respondent Minnesota Diversified Products, Inc.).

Considered and decided by DAVIES, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and HARTEN, Judge.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Rockford Township brought a declaratory judgment action against the City of Rockford, seeking a declaration that the city had improperly annexed 80 township acres. The district court dismissed the action for failure to apply for judicial review within the 30-day appeal period of Minn.Stat. § 414.07 (1998), and the township appealed. Because we agree that section 414.07 governs the time to seek judicial review of annexations by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases