1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 203 F.3d
  5. 203 F.3d 1305 (2000)
 

IN RE GARTSIDE

No. 99-1241.

203 F.3d 1305 (2000)

In re Robert J. GARTSIDE and Richard C. Norton

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 15, 2000

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan B. Clement, Heidman, Gibson & Costigan, of New York, New York, argued for appellants.

Mark Nagumo, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Albin F. Drost, Acting Solicitor; John M. Whealan, Acting Deputy Solicitor; and Nancy Moncys Isacson, Associate Solicitor.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. Norton (collectively "Gartside") appeal from the final decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences holding that claims 34, 35, and 37-47 of application Ser. No. 07/798,627 are unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. See Forgac v. Gartside, Paper No. 72 (BPAI May 21, 1998). Because the Board's factual findings relating to its obviousness analysis are supported by substantial evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases