PER CURIAM.
Defendant Daniel Wright ("defendant"), appeals his conviction claiming that the trial judge erred in answering a jury question without affording defendant's counsel an opportunity to be heard. We affirm.
After the jury submitted a written question to the court, the trial judge requested that the attorneys appear before him. Once the state and defense attorneys were present, the trial judge stated:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
