GLASS SERVICE CO. v. PROGRESSIVE INS. CO.

No. C9-99-1175.

603 N.W.2d 849 (2000)

GLASS SERVICE COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 4, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Lloyd, Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN (for respondent).

John M. Bjorkman, Brian A. Wood, Eric J. Magnuson, Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN (for appellants).

Thomas H. Goodman, Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (for amicus curiae Minnesota Independent Glass Association).

Considered and decided by DAVIES, Presiding Judge, FOLEY, Judge, and MULALLY, Judge.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Progressive Insurance Company argues that the trial court erred in interpreting appellant's insurance policy, having improperly substituted language from the Unfair Claims Practices Act (UCPA) in place of insurance policy language. We affirm.

FACTS

Under its automobile insurance policy, appellant Progressive Insurance Company provides coverage for windshield glass...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases