CHAMBERS v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

No. 97-1023.

205 F.3d 1237 (2000)

John H. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Margaret Heil, in her Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 7, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Byron Peddie and Catherine A. Hance, Frascona, Joiner & Goodman, P.C., Boulder, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ken Salazar, Attorney General, and Paul S. Sanzo, First Assistant Attorney General, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HENRY, HOLLOWAY, and PORFILIO, Circuit Judges.


OPINION ON REMAND

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Senior Circuit Judge.

The questions presented here are whether the Colorado Department of Corrections' Sex Offender Component classifying John H. Chambers a sex offender and requiring his participation in the Sexual Offender Treatment Program (SOTP) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and implicates a liberty interest under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases