1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 220 F.3d
  5. 220 F.3d 1213 (2000)
 

LAURINO v. TATE

No. 99-3170.

220 F.3d 1213 (2000)

Fredrick J. LAURINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith O. TATE; Kelly G. McIntosh; Michael R. Berry; Jeffrey A. Weinman; Steven Hiser; City of Wichita; Wichita Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. McDowell of McDowell & Edingfield, Wichita, Kansas, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gary E. Rebenstorf, City Attorney, and Blaise Plummer, Assistant City Attorney, Wichita, Kansas, for Defendants-Appellees Tate, McIntosh, Berry, Weinman and Hiser, and Edward L. Keeley of McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington, P.A., Wichita, Kansas, for Defendant-Appellee City of Wichita.

Before BRORBY, ANDERSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Fredrick J. Laurino appeals from the district court's order dismissing his claims brought against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mr. Laurino's counsel also challenges Fed. R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions imposed against him as part of this appeal.1 We affirm.

On July 21, 1995, Mr. Laurino was arrested for obstruction of legal process under a Wichita, Kansas municipal ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases