1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 221 F.3d
  5. 221 F.3d 1199 (2000)
 

FOLIAGE FOREST v. E.I. DuPONT De NEMOURS AND CO.

Nos. 97-5696 to 97-5700.

221 F.3d 1199 (2000)

FOLIAGE FOREST, INC., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DuPONT De NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation d.b.a. Dupont, and Crawford & Company, a Georgia Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Country Joe's Nursery, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation d.b.a. Dupont, and Crawford & Company, a Georgia Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Castleton Gardens, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation d.b.a. Dupont, and Crawford & Company, a Georgia Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Palm Beach Greenery, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation d.b.a. Dupont, and Crawford & Company, a Georgia Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Morningstar Nursery, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation d.b.a. Dupont, and Crawford & Company, a Georgia Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

August 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth Koebel Russo, Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Kimberly Lynn Boldt, Barranco, Kircher & Vogelsang, P.A., Ana M. Rivero, Ferraro & Associates, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant in all cases.

Paul L. Nettleton, R. Benjamine Reid, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Miami, FL, James F. Bogan, III, A. Stephens Clay, Kilpatrick & Cody, William H. Boice, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BARKETT and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs Foliage Forest, Country Joe's Nursery, Castleton Gardens, Palm Beach Greenery, and Morningstar Nursery, commercial nurseries whose plants were allegedly damaged by a DuPont product called Benlate, appeal the district court's orders finding that their fraudulent inducement claims were barred by the releases executed by plaintiffs in settlement agreements, and thereby dismissing the claims under Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases