On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the April 6, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals and the motion to amend are considered. The motion to amend is GRANTED. The application is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., concurs and states as follows:
In my view, a denial of leave to appeal is appropriate in this case because it lacks material error. Defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
