STATE v. LUM

No. 83,079.

27 Kan. App.2d 113 (2000)

998 P.2d 137

STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL LUM, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Opinion filed February 25, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie McKenna, county attorney, and Carla J. Stovall, attorney general, for appellant.

Jack Focht, of Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P., of Wichita, for appellee.

Before KNUDSON, P.J., ROGG, S.J., and MATTHEW J. DOWD, District Judge, assigned.


ROGG, J.:

The State makes an interlocutory appeal of the trial court's decision to suppress evidence.

A search warrant was issued for the search of defendant Michael Lum's residence. Lum subsequently filed a motion to suppress the evidence, in which he argued that the information supporting the warrant failed to provide probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.

The trial court granted Lum's motion. The State now brings an interlocutory appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases