1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 9 P.3d
  5. 9 P.3d 130 (2000)
 

LANE UNIFIED BARGAINING COUNCIL/SLEA/OEA/NEA v. SOUTH LANE SCH. DIST. 45J3

(UP-36-98; CA A106346)

9 P.3d 130 (2000)

169 Or. App. 280

LANE UNIFIED BARGAINING COUNCIL/SLEA/OEA/NEA, Petitioner, v. SOUTH LANE SCHOOL DISTRICT 45J3, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 2, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Bishop, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Elizabeth A. Joffe and Bennett, Hartman & Reynolds.

Nancy Hungerford, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Brian Hungerford and The Hungerford Law Firm.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.

BREWER, J.

Petitioner Lane Unified Bargaining Council/SLEA/OEA/NEA (Association) seeks judicial review of a final order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) dismissing claims that respondent South Lane School District (District) violated ORS 243.672(1)(g) and (h) by refusing to arbitrate a grievance filed by Association on behalf of a member of its bargaining unit and by failing to reduce an alleged settlement of that grievance to a written and signed contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases