DENMAN v. GANS

No. C0-99-982.

607 N.W.2d 788 (2000)

Thomas J. DENMAN, et al., Appellants, v. Carl W. GANS, et al., Respondents, Frank Muelken, Respondent, Robert W. Miles, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 28, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Gregory Simpson, Patrick H. Elliott, Elliott Law Firm, P.A., Edina, and James D. Bates, Bryce D. Huemoeller, Huemoeller & Bates, Prior Lake, for appellants.

Gary L. Wilson, Vincent J. Moccio, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, Minneapolis, and Scott D. Lake, Lake Law Firm, Prior Lake, for respondents Gans, et al.

Frank Muelken, Prior Lake, and Robert W. Miles, Prior Lake, pro se respondents.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, PETERSON, Judge, and ANDERSON, Judge.


OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

In this real property dispute, appellants challenge the district court's conclusion that the subject property could not be adversely possessed or abandoned as a matter of law and findings that appellants failed to establish adverse possession or abandonment. Appellants also challenge the denial of their demand for a jury trial and their motion to amend the complaint. Finally, appellants challenge the district court's declaration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases