1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 102 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 36 (2000)
 

PLUT v. FIREMAN'S FUND INS. CO.

No. B128620.

102 Cal.Rptr.2d 36 (2000)

85 Cal.App.4th 98

John PLUT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Review Denied February 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Perona, Langer, Beck & Lallande and Ellen R. Serbin, Long Beach, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Hager & Dowling, Thomas J. Dowling, Joy L. Lim and John V. Hager, Santa Barbara, for Defendant and Respondent.

CURRY, J.

Appellants John and Karen Plut challenge the trial court's adjustments to an award of damages after a jury found respondent Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (Fireman's Fund) liable for breach of insurance contract and bad faith. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Pluts bought a house in Rancho Palos Verdes in 1975. In 1989, Fireman's Fund...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases