1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 619 N.W.2d
  5. 619 N.W.2d 760 (2000)
 

GUNDERSON v. HARRINGTON

No. C7-00-999.

619 N.W.2d 760 (2000)

Corliss H. GUNDERSON, Appellant, v. Mark J. HARRINGTON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 21, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph M. Sokolowski, Kevin R. Coan, Parsinen, Klaplan, Rosberg & Gotlieb, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Jeffrey J. Lindquist, Pustorino, Tilton & Parrington, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and ANDERSON, Judge.

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant sued respondent, her former employer, alleging assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence. The district court awarded respondent summary judgment on the grounds that the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act precludes appellant's claims and that the intentional injury exception to that provision does not apply. Appellant challenges the summary judgment.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases