1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 613 N.W.2d
  5. 613 N.W.2d 760 (2000)
 

ZURICH v. CANADIAN PACIFIC

Nos. C5-99-1870, CX-99-1878.

613 N.W.2d 760 (2000)

ZURICH REINSURANCE (UK) LIMITED, a foreign corporation, et al., Respondents (C5-99-1870), Appellants (CX-99-1878), v. CANADIAN PACIFIC LIMITED, a foreign corporation, d/b/a CP Rail System, Canadian Pacific Limited, d/b/a Soo Line Corporation, a division and subsidiary of Canadian Pacific Limited, and Soo Line Railroad Company, Appellants (C5-99-1870), Respondents (CX-99-1878).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome B. Abrams, Laurie A. Heyerdahl, Abrams & Smith, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (for appellants Zurich Reinsurance, et al.).

John M. Sheran, Leonard, Street & Deinard, Minneapolis, MN (for respondents Canadian Pacific, et al.).

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, AMUNDSON, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

DORIS O. HUSPENI,* Judge.

Both appellants Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Limited, et al. (Zurich), and respondents Canadian Pacific Limited, et al. (Canadian Pacific), appeal from summary judgments granted against each of them in a case concerning Zurich's obligation to indemnify Canadian Pacific for payments made in a personal injury settlement. Zurich argues the settlement is unreasonable because (1) it is excessive; (2) Canadian...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases