1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 766 So.2d
  5. 766 So.2d 595 (2000)
 

ROGERS v. HORSESHOE ENTERTAINMENT

No. 32,800-CA.

766 So.2d 595 (2000)

Harold Davey ROGERS and Susan Whipple Rogers, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HORSESHOE ENTERTAINMENT, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 21, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Piper & Associates by Robert E. Piper, Jr., Shreveport, Poynter, Mannear & Colomb by W. Steven Mannear, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendants-Appellants.

Long Law Firm by Michael A. Patterson, Baton Rouge, Degravelles, Palmintier & Holthaus by John W. Degravelles, Hayes, Harkey, Smith & Cascioby by Joseph D. Cascio, Jr., Monroe, Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Before NORRIS, C.J., and KOSTELKA and DREW, JJ.

NORRIS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, Harold and Susan Rogers, brought suit to enforce a "Most Favored Nations" ("MFN") clause of an option contract (No. 32,800-CA). The Rogers also brought a second, subsequent legal malpractice suit against the law firm they had retained to draft the option contract and its insurer (No. 32,801-CA). After the suits were consolidated by the district court, summary judgments were granted on behalf of the Rogers in the contract suit and in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases