1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 228 F.3d
  5. 228 F.3d 1128 (2000)
 

PABST v. OKLAHOMA GAS & ELEC. CO.

Nos. 99-6108, 99-6150.

228 F.3d 1128 (2000)

Kathy PABST; James Gilley; and Steve Barton, Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 20, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah H. Bornstein, Gardner, Carton & Douglas, Chicago, Illinois (Hugh D. Rice, Roberta Browning Fields, Rainey, Ross, Rice & Binns, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and Katherine N. O'Connell, Gardner, Carton & Douglas, Chicago, Illinois, with her on the briefs), for the Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

Andrew W. Lester (Susan B. Loving and Shannon F. Davies on the briefs), Lester, Loving & Davies, P.C., Edmond, Oklahoma, for the Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

We again explore the question of when "on-call" time becomes sufficiently onerous to render it compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Surveying our precedents and applying them to the facts of this case, we conclude that plaintiffs' on-call duties requiring them to continually monitor automated alarms by pager and computer were compensable under the FLSA. In so holding, we reject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases