MARTENS v. MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO.

No. C0-98-2303.

616 N.W.2d 732 (2000)

John A. MARTENS, et al., Respondents, v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied October 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Thomas Tinkham, Peter S. Hendrixson, Robert R. Reinhart, James M. Zappa, Minneapolis, Carol, A Peterson, St. Paul, for appellant.

Sprenger & Lang PLLC, Lawrence P. Schaefer, James R. Behrenbrinker, Lisa C. Stratton, Minneapolis, Paul C. Spenger, Michael D. Lieder, Maia Caplan, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Eric Magnuson, Rider Bennett Egan & Arundel, Minneapolis, for amicus curiae Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Business Partnership.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Respondents John A. Martens and Gerald J. Niles, two long-term technical employees of appellant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (appellant) allege that appellant's written and oral statements regarding a dual ladder system for compensating and promoting technical employees were sufficiently definite to constitute an offer for a unilateral contract and a promise enforceable under a promissory estoppel theory. They further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases