1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 207 F.3d
  5. 207 F.3d 1136 (2000)
 

U.S. v. STANDARD

No. 98-50632.

207 F.3d 1136 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Michael STANDARD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 29, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Standard, pro se, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Alka Sagar and Julie Werner-Simon, Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: D.W. NELSON, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Robert Michael Standard was convicted of, inter alia, subscribing to a false tax return. In this, his third appeal, he challenges the district court's computation of the base offense level for his tax conviction. The district court relied on the presentence report's statement that Standard improperly deducted more than $1.7 million on his 1988 tax return. Standard objected to this statement as factually and legally incorrect. We have jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases