1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 219 F.3d
  5. 219 F.3d 1115 (2000)
 

IN RE CEDIC DEVELOPMENT CO.

No. 99-15841

219 F.3d 1115 (2000)

In re: CEDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Debtor. Cedic Development Company, Appellee, v. Ronald E. Warnicke; Thomas Littler, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 26, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Littler, Mark J. Giunta, Warnicke & Littler, Phoenix, Arizona, for appellant Warnicke & Littler.

Chester J. Peterson, Lerch, McDaniel & Deprima, Phoenix, Arizona, for debtor-appellee Cedic Development Co.

Before: NOONAN, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Warnicke & Littler (the Firm) appeals the district court's denial of $10,000 additional attorneys fees in its representation of the bankrupt debtor, Cedic Development Co. (Cedic). We hold that the basic rates charged by the firm did not take into account all relevant factors and that as adequate compensation the Firm was entitled to the $10,000. We reverse the judgment of the district court.

FACTS

The following facts were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases