FRIENDS OF THE WILD SWAN, INC., Alliance for the Wild Rockies Inc., Ecology Center, Inc., American Wildlands, Inc., Montana Environmental Information Center Inc., Plaintiffs,
v.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Carol Browner, Administrator, Jack McGraw, Region VIII EPA Administrator, Defendants,
and
State of Montana, ex rel. Department of Environmental Quality, Montana Wood Products Association, Montana Stockgrowers Association, and Montana Farm Bureau Federation, Intervenors.
United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 21, 2000.
September 21, 2000.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jack R. Tuholske, Missoula, MT, Jory Ruggiero, Bozeman, MT, for Friends of Wild Swan, Alliance of Wild Rockies, Ecology Center, Inc., American Wildlands.
Claudia L. Massman, Helena, MT, Jack R. Tuholske, Missoula, MT, Jory Ruggiero, Bozeman, MT, for Montana Environmental Information Center, Inc.
Deanne L. Sandholm, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, Daniel R. Dertke, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environmental Defense Section, Washington, DC, Margaret J. Livingston, Associate Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Denver, CO, for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carol M. Browner, Jack Region VIII.
John F. North, Claudia L. Massman, Jane Amdahl, Montana Dept. of Environmental Quality, Helena, MT, for State of Montana, ex rel., Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Rebecca W. Watson, Jeffrey M. Hindoien, Gough Shananhan Johnson & Waterman, Helena, MT, for Montana Wood Products Ass'n.
Rebecca W. Watson, Jeffrey M. Hindoien, Gough Shananhan Johnson & Waterman, Helena, MT, John E. Bloomquist, Doney Crowley & Bloomquist, Helena, MT, for Montana Stockgrowers Ass'n., Montana Farm Bureau Federation.
United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division.
ORDER
MOLLOY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Intervenors each move to amend the Order and Judgment of June 21, 2000. The amendments proposed by Defendants and Intervenors would change the substance of the Court's Order so they are denied. The amendment proposed by Plaintiff clarifies the Order and Judgment. It is granted.
Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend
Plaintiffs ask the Court to revise ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
