BINGHAM v. HAMILTON

No. CIV. S-99-0499 DFL JFM.

100 F.Supp.2d 1233 (2000)

Perry J. BINGHAM, D.D.S., and the American Academy of Implant Dentistry, Plaintiffs, v. Cathleen HAMILTON, in her Official Capacity as Director, California Department of Consumer Affairs, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

May 15, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W Nichols, McDonough Holland and Allen, Sacramento, CA, Frank R Recker, pro hac vice, Frank R Recker and Associates, Marco Island, FL, for Plaintiffs.

Joel S Primes, Attorney General's Office of the State of California, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

LEVI, District Judge.

This is a First Amendment commercial speech case in which plaintiffs Perry Bingham and the American Academy of Implant Dentistry (AAID) challenge the California State Board of Dental Examiners' ("California Dental Board" or "Dental Board") enforcement policy prohibiting the advertisement of certain credentials by California licensed dentists. Plaintiffs now move for summary judgment. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases