1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 9 P.3d
  5. 9 P.3d 123 (2000)
 

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS v. CLEMONS

(97-00968; CA A101296)

9 P.3d 123 (2000)

169 Or. App. 231

In the Matter of the Compensation of James E. Clemons, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. James E. CLEMONS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 26, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Bolen, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Hornecker, Cowling, Hassen & Heysell.

Benton Flaxel, North Bend, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Flaxel & Nylander.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

Employer Roseburg Forest Products (employer) seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming an administrative law judge's (ALJ) award of scheduled and unscheduled disability for claimant's accepted claim of "left-sided sciatica." We reverse and remand.

In May 1996, claimant experienced pain and numbness along the left posterior lateral thigh, calf, and foot while driving a forklift at work. Dr. Brazer examined claimant and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases