U.S. v. MILLER

No. 99-10094.

205 F.3d 1098 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 8, 2000


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Silvert, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the defendant-appellant.

Lawrence L. Tong, Assistant United States Attorney, and Craig Nakamura, Assistant United States Attorney, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: BRIGHT, PREGERSON, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.


BRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

James A. Miller ("Miller") moved to modify his fine following his felony conviction, but the district court dismissed Miller's motion for lack of jurisdiction. In this appeal, Miller argues that-at least where payment of a fine is made an express condition of supervised release-18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) gives the district courts authority to hear such motions. We agree and therefore REVERSE and REMAND.

I. BACKGROUND

Miller...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases