1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 209 F.3d
  5. 209 F.3d 1091 (2000)
 

U.S. v. DANIEL

No. 99-10268.

209 F.3d 1091 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allen David DANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 19, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary M. French, Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, for the defendant-appellant.

William C. Hahesy, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, California,, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, District Judge.

MILLER, District Judge:

Defendant Allen David Daniel ("Daniel") appeals the revocation of his supervised release. This appeal raises the question of whether a district court must make written findings in support of a decision to revoke supervised release and also requires us to review the sufficiency of the district court's oral findings in this case. We hold oral findings made on the record satisfy due process and otherwise affirm the district court.

Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases