1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 220 F.3d
  5. 220 F.3d 1073 (2000)
 

CATO v. FRESNO CITY

No. 96-17245.

220 F.3d 1073 (2000)

Ralph S. CATO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FRESNO CITY; Daryl Balch, Defendants-Appellants, and J. Bradin; R. Matsumoto, Defendants, and Michael G. Marderosian, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 17, 2000

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael G. Marderosian, Marderosian, Swanson, Oren & Paboojian, Fresno, California, pro per for the appellant.

No appearance for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: BROWNING, RYMER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The question is whether an order imposing sanctions against an attorney pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f) is immediately appealable. Applying the principles established in Cunningham v. Hamilton County, 527 U.S. 198, 119 S.Ct. 1915, 144 L.Ed.2d 184 (1999) (holding that sanctions orders under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(4) are not immediately appealable), we hold that such orders are appealable only after final judgment has been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases