STATE v. RUSSO


745 A.2d 540 (2000)

328 N.J. Super. 181

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel RUSSO and John Ott, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lorraine J. Nielsen, for defendants-appellants (A. Kenneth Weiner, attorney, East Brunswick; Ms. Nielsen, on the brief).

Thomas J. Butler, Jr., for plaintiff-respondent (Conti & Mallozzi, attorneys, Union; Mr. Butler, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, CONLEY and COBURN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by COBURN, J.A.D.

In September 1995, defendants began operating a sexually oriented business, known as "Hott 22," in a commercial zone in Union Township. The main activity of this establishment was the public presentation of nude female dancing.

Complaints were soon filed against the defendants charging that the exhibition of nude dancing violated sections 84-11 and 84-12 of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases