PER CURIAM.
Appellant argues that the trial court erred in imposing 22-month concurrent prison sentences upon his violation of probation because he did not have a prior felony conviction as required by the applicable statute and rule. We agree and reverse.
In 1998 appellant pled to felony charges of forgery and uttering in Escambia County. His guidelines scoresheet showed that he had no prior felony convictions and recommended any nonstate prison sanction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
