1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 15 P.3d
  5. 15 P.3d 1266 (2000)
 

FAUST v. KAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 980292.

15 P.3d 1266 (2000)

2000 UT 82

David L. FAUST, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and American Phoenix, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Rehearing Denied November 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon W. Duval, Christine M. Petersen, Pleasant Grove, for plaintiff.

David K. Detton, Salt Lake City, and Creighton R. Magid, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendants.

HOWE, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiff David L. Faust appeals from a judgment awarded him against his former employer, defendant KAI Technologies, Inc., which included $1500 in attorney fees. He contends that by misinterpreting the term "wages" in Utah Code Ann. § 34-27-1 (1994),1 the trial court made an insufficient award of attorney fees.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In May 1993...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases