1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 97 F.Supp.2d
  5. 97 F.Supp.2d 1181 (2000)
 

QUANTACHROME CORP. v. MICROMERITICS INSTRUMENT

No. 96-8224-CIV.

97 F.Supp.2d 1181 (2000)

QUANTACHROME CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MICROMERITICS INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida.

May 23, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Higer, Mintz, Trupman, Clein, & Higer, P.A., North Miami, FL, Robert M. Schwartz, Robert M. Schwartz, P.A., Miami, FL, Barry R. Davidson, Hunton & Williams, P.A., Miami, FL, for plaintiff.

Connis O. Brown, Seth Robert, Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, Holmes J. Hawkins, Jones & Askew, L.L.P., Atlanta, GA, Albert S. Anderson, Patent Law Offices of Albert S. Anderson, Norcross, GA, for defendant.

ORDER

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon the non-jury trial of this matter, and upon Quantachrome's Motion to Reconsider Court's Claim 27 Orders, filed March 30, 2000. The Court, having reviewed the record and having considered the evidence and arguments presented at trial, makes the following findings and conclusions.

I. BACKGROUND

Quantachrome and Micromeritics are competing companies engaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases