GODFREY v. HARTFORD CAS. INS. CO.

No. 42985-0-I.

993 P.2d 281 (2000)

99 Wash.App. 216

John A. GODFREY, Respondent, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

January 31, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda B. Clapham, Charles C. Huber, Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP, Seattle, for Appellant.

Tom Chambers, Seattle, for Respondent.


BAKER, J.

An insurance policy provided for binding arbitration to determine the insured's eligibility to recover damages from under-insured motorist coverage, but also provided that either party could request a trial de novo to determine the amount of damages. The insured and the carrier agreed to arbitration pursuant to the policy. The insurer did not accept the arbitrators' decision as to the amount of damages and, pursuant to the policy, requested trial de novo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases