PEDRO v. ARMOUR SWIFT-ECKRICH

No. 99-4103-SAC.

118 F.Supp.2d 1155 (2000)

Lucy PEDRO, Plaintiff, v. ARMOUR SWIFT-ECKRICH, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Kunkel Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a CK Enterprises, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

September 26, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry O. Boaten, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff.

James R. McKown, Kristine Anne Tidgren, Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Kansas City, MO, Donald Patterson, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Topeka, KS, William A. Larson, Gehrt & Roberts, Chartered, Topeka, KS, Richard V. Eckert, Office of Shawnee County Counselor, Topeka, KS, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

The case comes before the court on the motion of the plaintiff Lucy Pedro to review (Dk. 51) the magistrate judge's memorandum and order filed March 23, 2000, (Dk. 49), which denied her motion to join (Dk. 38) F.R. Drake Company ("Drake") as a defendant. The plaintiff filed her motion for review approximately thirty-two days after the magistrate judge filed his decision. The plaintiff's motion is untimely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases