1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 133 F.Supp.2d
  5. 133 F.Supp.2d 1139 (2000)
 

GAPAY v. Q & S ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. A99-0415-CV (HRH).

133 F.Supp.2d 1139 (2000)

Hugh GAPAY, Plaintiff, v. Q & S ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Alaska.

May 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lanning M. Trueb, Beard Stacey, Anchorage, AK, James M. Beard, Beard Stacey, Seattle, WA, for Hugh Gapay.

Laura L. Farley, LeGros Buchanan & Paul, Anchorage, AK, for Q & S Enterprises, Inc.

ORDER

HOLLAND, District Judge.

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

Defendant Q & S Enterprises, Inc., moves for summary judgment against plaintiff.1 The motion is opposed. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment against defendant on the issue of unseaworthiness.2 The motion is opposed. Oral argument has not been requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases