SUPREME CT. BD. OF PROF. ETHICS v. SULLINS

No. 99-1663.

613 N.W.2d 656 (2000)

IOWA SUPREME COURT BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT, Complainant, v. Ray SULLINS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

Rehearing Denied August 10, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman G. Bastemeyer and David J. Grace, Des Moines, for complainant.

Ray Sullins, Des Moines, pro se.

Considered en banc.


PER CURIAM.

The lawyer in this disciplinary case is unwilling or unable to discharge the duties required in the practice. Because of his repeated failures to face up to these responsibilities, we suspend his license for not less than one year. We also direct that his license shall not be reinstated until he makes the showing we hereinafter describe.

Although other highly disturbing misconduct is hinted, the central theme in this exasperating case is "stonewalling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases