1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 120 F.Supp.2d
  5. 120 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2000)
 

C.R. BARD, INC. v. M3 SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 93 C 4788.

120 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2000)

C.R. BARD, INC., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, v. M3 SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

June 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry M. Grimm, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, Desiree M. Stahl, Morgan & Finnegan, New York, NY, Mark L. Hogge, Morgan & Finnegan, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff.

Paul E. Slater, Sperling & Slater, P.C., Chicago, IL, Richard D. Harris, Dick & Harris, Chicago, IL, Jordan A. Sigale, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

C.R. Bard, Inc. ("Bard") brought a patent infringement action against its competitor M3 Systems, Inc. ("M3"), which in turn raised antitrust counterclaims against Bard. A jury found in favor of M3 on the claims and counterclaims, and Bard appealed. The verdict on one of Bard's three counterclaims was upheld, but the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the damage award for redetermination. M3 seeks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases